Jure Sanguinis

Or, citizenship by blood (descent).  I have been asked many times if it is possible through the Pantoliano family.

The short answer is probably not, but this bears some explaining.

Giuseppe Pantoliano, his wife Maria Rosa Totaro and all their children (as well as his brothers and sisters) all emigrated to the US in the late 1870s early 1800s, and settled in Little Italy in NYC.  Ultimately most of them moved to Hoboken.  At some point they naturalized, becoming US citizens.

Before we get into it all, every variation of Jure Sanguinis depends upon whether the US born child was born BEFORE the parent naturalized.  That’s how you claim Italian citizenship, because your ancestor was technically an Italian citizen when born.  There  are other rules when dealing with female ancestors but we’ll get to that.

So for anyone trying to get citizenship from Pasquale, Pietro, Anna Branda, or Maria Torra we have to prove that THEIR children were born before they naturalized.   I have also learned that many people try to gain citizenship claiming the ancestor never naturalized because they cannot find the petition (most likely due to horrible misspellings of the name ~ which for Pantoliano is especially bad). That’s when the federal census comes into play.

Lets start with the Patriarch, Giuseppe Pantoliano.  All my research suggests he naturalized in 1886, but I cannot prove it.  The following petition was witnessed by Antonio Monaco (who MIGHT have been his son in law by his daughter Carminella).

US Naturalization Record Indexes 17911992 Indexed

Taken alone it could be nothing, but if you look at it along side this document, then you can make the connection that it probably IS Giuseppe due to the address, and the approximately correct birthday for Pasquale, his son.

US Naturalization Record Indexes 17911992 Indexed(1)

Compelling but not definitive. If this is correct and Giuseppe naturalized in 1886, then all his minor children would inherit his citizenship. That would automatically disqualify Peter, Maria Torra and Anna Branda and their descendants.

Pasquale is exempt because he was 22 in 1886, but if the second document is correct, and he naturalized in 1884– that disqualifies all his descendants.

For the sake of argument, let’s say that these are not the correct Giuseppe & Pasquale and further that we are unable to produce any other documentation regarding citizenship.  The embassy is not just going to take your word for it, they’ll do research of their own and the first thing the look at is the census.

Giuseppe is marked as naturalized in the 1900 census (na means naturalized, al is alien). Anna Branda is no longer a minor but there is no indication.

1900 United States Federal Census

Both Pasquale and Peter are living in the same building in 1900, and both are marked as naturalized.

1900 United States Federal Census(4)

Giuseppe, Pasquale, and Peter are all marked as naturalized in every subsequent census, essentially disqualifying ALL their descendants. Making it even worse for Pasquale & Peter, their naturalization years appear on the 1920 census. So we can’t argue that children born before 1900 might qualify.

But the interesting thing to note is that their wives are not specifically marked as naturalized; just the adult men: like for Maria Torra.

1900 United States Federal Census(3)

If we look through the subsequent censuses only in 1920 are both Maria Monaco and Rosa Mastrangela indicated to be naturalized. Maria Monaco is listed as 1884, so that disqualifies Pasquale’s descendants on both sides.

That’s a slight glimmer for Rosa Mastrangela, but if she’d not been naturalized, it should have said ‘al’ for Alien.

I present this here just as advice, not as anything concrete because I cannot prove that Giuseppe naturalized in 1886 nor that Pasquale naturalized in 1884.  I think the evidence is convincing, but that’s just me.  If your closest relative was born after 1900, you are probably out of luck.

For what it’s worth, I find the evidence so convincing that I can’t go through the Pantolianos that I am pursuing citizenship through my great grandfather Battista d’Attilio who naturalized in 1924 with my grandmother being born in 1915.

And finally.

You have to be prepared to spend a LOT of $$ on records, corrections, translations, and apostille.  This apart from the fee to meet with the consulate.  If you’re going to try, BE SURE and also engage with a specialist/lawyer who can review the case in advance.
(But book your appointment with the consulate NOW, because, at least in MA, they’re booking 2 years in advance.)

Good luck, cugini.  I’ll see you over there!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What’s in a Name Part 5: It Means What?

With the lode of vital records pouring in and showing clear evidence that nearly all first-generation US born children were christened with Italian names and not their English equivalents, I’ve decided to honor that in the tree.

A quick translation guide, if you’re not already familiar:  most of these are fairly obvious.

Pasquale/Paschal : Patrick
Pietro : Peter
Giuseppe : Joseph
Giuseppa: Josephine
Pasqualina : Patricia
Rosa/Rosina : Rose
Giovanni : John
Gaetano : Thomas
Carmela : Mildred/Millie
Domenica/Hermina : Minnie
Antonio : Anthony
Antonia/Antonetta/Antonett: Antoinette
Saverio : Sam, Sylvester
Sabato : Sam
Vincenzo : Vincent, James.  Yes.  JAMES [which solved the mystery of where James Pantoliano was interred]
Angelo : Charles [how I was able to connect the Fischetto's & Fischkeltas, btw].
Francesco : Frank
Domenico : Dominick
Michele : Michael
Raffaele : Raphael, Ralph
Lucia : Lucy
Margherita: Margaret,Peggy
Angelina : Lena, Jean

IMG_0051

The Great-Great Grandfather Lode

By turning my attention from things like Ancestry/Family Search and looking at actual records, I hoped to uncover not only more details that aren’t often put in the public indexes but also to get a better sense of how/where the Pantolianos lived.

I started with reviewing the records in the NYC Municipal Archives.  I spent nearly 8 hours zipping through various rolls of microfillm.  And the result was great — confirming hunches I had made about kids who died young.

New Jersey doesn’t consider their records vital information, so I had to pay for them.  The first order came in yesterday and I couldn’t have asked for better results.

In only 9 records, I was able to

1. Confirm/learn the birth & death dates of Giovanni Pantoliano, and Angelina, Giuseppe, and Anna Branda.

2. Learn the addresses of the parents during those years.

3. Identify one of the “lost” children of Peter Pantoliano. Her name is Maria and she died as an infant in 1896.

4. Solve the mystery of the first Mamie Pantoliano.  She died at age 9 and her actual name was Maria Carmella – I suspect she was called Mamie because she had older sisters Mariarosa and Carmella.  She’s buried in Holy Name under the name Maria C Pondohario.

5. Learn that Rose Branda’s birth name is Maria Rosa.

6. Erase any doubt that the Mariantonia Pantoliano I located in NY is in fact Anna Branda as on each of her children’s records and her marriage certificate she goes by Antonia.

7. Giuseppe’s birthday is 1846 on his death cert. That does not jive with the 1834 from the census.  More digging needed.

8. Oh, and learn the names of the parents of Giuseppe Pantoliano (who I have so far been using as the “Patriarch” of all of this) and in so doing confirm my theory that Pasquale was the first born.  Although I was wrong about the mother’s name.  Giuseppe’s parents were Pasquale Pantoliano and Nicoletta M(illegible).

I have at least another 40-50 on the way/to order.  Who knows what else we’ll get.

new_scan12656

Who is She?

new_scan12657

When I first came across this photo (and the others in the set) I could only identify Rose Romano Pantoliano (l) and Mary Pantoliano Fischkelta (c).  Since then I’ve learned that it is Anna Pantoliano Branda at right.

This is where it gets dicey.  Some have said the girl in Mary’s lap is her daughter Gloria. And others have said that the girl seated on the ground is Anna’s daughter Anna.  Nobody knows who is behind the wheel.

Someone is wrong.  Gloria (b.1927) is 13 years younger than Anna (b.1914).

Assuming that the seated girl is 4-6 and the girl on the lap is 1-2 AND that the girls are the daughters of the women to whom they are closest, here are the viable scenarios.

1. The girl on the ground IS Anna.  That dates the photo to 1919-1920.  That would make the girl in the lap either Mary Fischkelta Monaco (b. 1917) or Jean Fischkelta Barone (b. 1918).

2. The girl in the lap IS Gloria.  That dates the photo to 1928-1929.  The girl on the ground is either Mary Branda (b. 1922) or Florrie Branda (b.1923).

3. The girl in the lap is Anna Fischkelta Mulligan (b. 1921) dating the photo to 1923-1924. The girl on the ground can only be Carmella Branda Whalen (b.1919).

But why would Mary and Anna pose with their children and not Rose?  If we factor her in, then….

4. The girl on the ground is Anna and the seated child is Mary Pantoliano Marzocca (b. 1917).

5. The seated child is Anna Pantoliano Girardo (b.1921) and the girl on the ground is Carmella.

But what about the young woman behind the wheel.  She is the mystery because she is in several of the group photos and one on her own as if she is part of the family.  Like a sister….

doris_154

We’ve established that it is Rose Giordano (b.1905)  in the center.  And I’ve been told that it is Angelina Branda (b. 1907) to her left.  Mystery woman is on the right.

But what if mystery woman is Angelina instead of the woman on the left?  In the above photo both she and Rose appear to be in their early 20s.  This fits with the scenario #2 above.  Gloria is in the lap, Mary/Florrie is on the ground.

Anna Branda would be about 15-16 at that time — maybe Anna is the sister on the left?

 

 

new_scan12657

The Anna Branda Dilemma

It took a lot of sleuthing to figure out (with proof) the Anna Branda connection to the established Pantoliano siblings Pasquale & Pietro.  She was very clearly one of the Pantoliano children NOT born in Italy, as by all accounts, Giuseppe & Mariarosa emigrated in either 1879 or 1880.

The notoriously bad  (birthdate wise) 1900 federal census has an Antonett Pantoliano born in 1886 — making her by far the youngest of all the siblings.  But every other census has her born in either 1881 or 1882.  Her brother Frank was born in April 1882 — so unless they were twins (which I can find no evidence of), it would have to be 1881.

The thing about the 1900 census is that while they totally dropped the ball on the year, they almost always got the month right.  So now we have May 1881.

So now we have Anna/Anne/Antonett Pantoliano born possibly in May 1881. No hits in all the normal places.  I’d hoped that since I located the Branda plot in the Holy Name Cemetery I could get a birth-year off that but according to a cousin, there is no grave marker.

BUT….if again we might  have all kinds of issues with spelling and Italian versus Americanized names….  (A good example is Mary Pantoliano Fischkelta:  her birth record is Mariarosa Pantoliano (after her grandmother)).

What if her given name wasn’t Anna OR Antonetta???

So I broadened the search a bit and (start 2001 A Space Odyssey timpani) and found a Mariantonia Pantaliana born 14 May 1881, in Manhattan [where the Pantolianos lived until moving to NJ in the 1890s].  The parents are Maria Rosa Satara Pantaliana and Guiseppe Pantaliana.  Satara is not a far stretch from Totaro.   And a compelling case could be made that the Antonett on the 1900 census is simply a nickname for Mariantonia; that she’d not go by Maria stands to reason because two of her sisters Maria and Maria Giuseppa have the same name….

 

rcancem

Blk-F Sec-156 Gr-5: Holy Name Holy Grail

One of the enduring mysteries so far (without any access to the Hudson Observer which is STILL not OCR scanned), is what happened to Giuseppe Pantoliano and Maria Rosa Totaro.

They appear, living with their children Anthony and Frank in the 1910 Census but disappear after that.  They don’t show up in the 1920 census, nor in the 1915 New Jersey State Census.  I’d been working under the assumption that they died between 1910 and 1915.  But then I realized the 1915 census is simply missing records:  Pasquale’s family, for example, is missing but is listed in the Hoboken white pages….

Somewhere I saw it noted that they died in Italy — as it was apparently, not uncommon, for the first wave of immigrants to go back and forth.

On a whim I started doing broad searches of the Holy Name Cemetery database hoping to find some sort of further egregious misspelling of Pantoliano.  Scrolling through hundreds of records, I caught site of Guiseppe Pandoliano — good, but without context it could be anybody.

His grave marker was Blk-F Sec-156 Gr-5 1C  — which means that there are at least two people already in that plot.  Because the service doesn’t let you search by plot, I had to keep coming up with permutations of Pantoliano to find the other people in the grave.

Bingo! Maria C and Vincenzo “Pandohario” (which is perhaps the worst yet misspelling) in graves 1A and 1E (meaning there are at least 5 people in the plot now)

But damn.   Giuseppe’s wife is Maria Rosa not Maria C, and he had no children named Vincenzo. I could have stopped right there by my Family Tree OCD wouldn’t let me give it up and so I kept at it.

I found Giovanni Pandolino in 1B and Maria R Pondoliano in 1D.

Wait. Maria R?  Died in 1918 with Giuseppe in 1916?  That fits but the other three I’ve got nothing for. It sounded right. It felt right but I couldn’t commit to it.

So I am driving home from work inexplicably running it through my mind again — how do Maria C, Vincenzo and Giovanni fit?   Ok.  Giovanni is “John”.  Vincenzo is Vincent.  No, wait is is ALSO JAMES.  Pasquale had 2 kids named John and James for whom I have no death info.

Pulse starts racing.  What about Maria C?  Pasquale’s last child without death info is Mamie #1.  But Mamie #2’s name wasn’t Mamie, it was Domenica.  Maybe Mamie#1 is a nickname for…..Maria?

I got home and checked the dates and it all works.

Giuseppe died Jan 1916
Maria died Mar 1918
Giovanni died Jun 1910
Mamie/Maria died Apr 1910
James died Aug 1920

Whew.

Now onto the Calvary Cemetery in Brooklyn for some of the “lost”….

Pietro Pantoliano's birth record

How Old Are You Now?

Birth dates.  It’s so easy now for us to trust the accuracy of them.  Especially natively born ancestors.  But for the immigrant generation it’s another matter entirely.  We contend with language barriers, no formal records, recollection (or the lack thereof) and lazy census takers.

Take Peter Pantoliano, for example.

  • His WW1 Draft card reads: 29 Jun 1873
  • His Social Security Claims reads: 28 Jul 1885
  • The 1910, 1920 & 1940 censuses suggest 1873
  • The 1930 census suggests 1872
  • His headstone reads 1873

Apparently the 1900 census is incomplete (Peter is not in it) — which is a good thing because it is notoriously inaccurate — but it lulls you into thinking that it’s authoritative because it gives birth information as month/year.

Guess what.  It’s all wrong.   Peter’s birthday is 28 Jun 1871.

For the longest time I wondered how the “Ancestors from Campania” site got such detailed information on the 2nd generation of the Pantoliano family.  Recently I discovered that the Registrati dello stato civilie di (vital records of) Monte San Giacomo exists.

Whomever created that website must have gone through several thousand scans (of varying quality) of birth, marriage and death records between 1866 and 1910.  That range covers Maria, Maria Giuseppa, Antonio, Pietro and Michele Pantoliano.  It also explains why the site lists Pasquale according to his 1900 census birthday and doesn’t list Carmella at all.  Frank and Anna were born in the US.

Using the archive I was able to find the birth records for the all the Italian born children, except Pasquale and Carmella — as the 1864/5 books are apparently too destroyed to be viewed — as well as the death record of the toddler Michele.

Peter’s record:

Pietro Pantoliano's birth record

The rest of the scans are loaded in the photo archive.

 

census

The Lost

Looking at the actual scanned pages of the census documents gives a wealth of information about the family:  address (mostly Jackson Street in Hoboken); years of immigration and naturalization; occupation (a considerable number of bartenders); literacy and much more.

Two facts they recorded in both the 1900 and 1910 Federal Censuses were Number of Children Born and Number of Children Living.   Going through the families, it’s incredible to see how many children were born, of whom there is no record at all.

In 1900
[there is no record for Peter & Rosa in the 1900 census; Anna & Dominic weren't yet married]

Born Living
Giuseppe & Maria Rosa Pantoliano 13 7
Pasquale & Maria Pantoliano 7 7
Anthony & Maria Torra 5 5

In 1910

Born Living
Giuseppe & Maria Rosa Pantoliano 13 6
Pasquale & Maria 14 12
Peter & Rosa 8 6
Anthony & Maria Torra 15 8
Dominick & Anna Branda 4 3

By 1923 when Florrie Branda (the last of the 3rd generation was born)

Born Living
Giuseppe & Maria Rosa Pantoliano (both deceased) 13 5
Pasquale & Maria (both deceased) 16 12
Peter & Rosa 10 8
Anthony & Maria Torra 15 8
Dominic & Anna Branda 10 9

Comparing all this with the tree, there are at least 6 siblings and 8 children unaccounted for.   Too bad they didn’t track it on the 1920 census because there are precious few birth, baptism and funeral records for newborns/kids.

What’s in a Name Part 4: Prejudice

If you haven’t seen  PBS’s The Italian Americans documentary.  You should.  It is a perfect representation of the Pantoliano family history from Naples-area emigration, to US assimilation, to serving in WWII (against Italy), and finally achieving some fame.

The second & third parts of the documentary contend with the Italian experience in the US and how, until there was a new ethnicity lower on the totem pole, they were the bottom. And the stereotpyes and bigotry proliferated:

In some cases, there was early successes despite the prejudice: Ralph Fischkelta built several successful businesses in North Jersey, Peter Pantoliano became a Fire Chief. But there were others who, for whatever reason, needed to distance themselves from their obvious Italian heritage by changing their names.

So in addition to the Pantoliano name, we also have Pantlin and Paine. Peter Pantlin is the son of Patrick (“Pope”) and built a very successful real-estate development business in the south. Around 1954 (perhaps shortly after his father Anthony, “Squidgy” died) Fred Pantoliano became Fred Paine.

I do not bring this up to ostracize them; but to illustrate merely that they followed a much more widespread convention in de-Europeanizing their names, making it that much harder to track down.

 

lions

What’s in a Name Part 3: Pride

Going through this project the number of permutations/misspellings of Pantoliano have been staggering. Not surprising when it is likely that the immigrants were illiterate, spoke only Italian, and had to deal with census takers/city officials who just wanted to move on to the next family.

So far we have

  • Pantoliano
  • Pantaleon
  • Potaliano
  • Bantoliano
  • Patsliano
  • Pandliano
  • Pantolino
  • Pautolious
  • Pintalino
  • Pantaliam
  • Pondoliano
  • Pontaliano
  • Pantshano
  • Ponduliano
  • Pantiliano
  • Panteliana
  • Pandalino
  • Vandalino
  • Palentato
  • Pantilano
  • Pantagliano

Now you know why this has been so hard.  But which one is right?  By most accounts it is Pantoliano, which is still used by the Monte San Giacomese today.

Arguably, however, it derives from Pantaleone which liberally translated means always/all (Panta) lions (Leone).

We’re fierce.  Get used to it.